Why Personalized Learning Should Be Centerstage At The World Economic Forum

Education

It is necessary that when the world leaders meet this week World Economic Forum, focus on preparing in the best way the workforce of the future. And a great way to do it is to make the center of that Forum from globalization to climate change and, of course, education. Issues such as who does the work and how and where it is done affect each of these issues, since artificial intelligence, automation, and robotics continue to enter the workplace. It is no secret that for some there is a certain fear that, in this scenario, humans may be displaced. It also establishes as a problem the possibility that changes in the labor force create even greater gaps within economies and between economies. The serious potential of this expanding disparity must be disregarded.

However, there will be an improved role for humans in the workplace with technology enabled. In fact, Burning Glass Technologies predicts that humans with a dual skill set of technical skills and creativity, a combination of “left brain” and “right brain”, will find themselves in fast-growing, well-paid occupations. However, there is a much more significant problem, and that is how to prepare more such workers. This must certainly be achieved in all economies, and it must be done in the most efficient and profitable way. It is no surprise that this becomes a real challenge for education, which will be responsible for enriching each of these individuals with the necessary knowledge.

A great alternative

It should be noted that we are currently facing a dilemma and that the traditional education system could potentially meet more requirements for the future student. However, most of the time is still devoted to the acquisition of knowledge. Traditional education, both in the school system and in most corporations, is problematic because it lacks personalization.

A possible and perhaps great alternative could be the “Tutor Model”. And it is that 35 years ago, Benjamin Bloom showed that individual tutoring dramatically increases the effectiveness of learning compared to the traditional classroom. What is this? The answer is simple, and that is that the tutors identify and respond to the needs of each student. On many occasions, they overlook what has already been mastered and spend more time with additional resources in areas where students have difficulties.

It is also necessary to emphasize that individual tutoring is much stricter. Despite this, even with its personalized approach, adaptive learning cannot and must not address the whole need for greater knowledge and the development of skills and character.

Read more.

Source: Ulrik Juul Christensen | Forbes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *