Matt Gurney: A brutally clear Philpott leaves no room for Liberal spin
Jane Philpott is a Canadian politician and doctor who represents the driving of Markham-Stouffville in the House of Commons. Philpott, the member of the Liberal Party, was elected for the first time in the federal elections of 2015 and was appointed to the Cabinet of the 29th Ministry of Canada, headed by Justin Trudeau, on November 4, 2015. On March 4, 2019, Philpott resigned his cabinet. Position as President of the Treasury Board on the SNC-Lavalin scandal.
You cannot ignore the harsh reality. Therefore, it is presumed that Philpott resigned due to evidence that the government acted against the rule of law
Philpott when resigning did not leave quietly. Being that he was going out the door, he sent a message to the prime minister. With accuracy, a letter that also shared openly in their social media channels.
More problems for Justin Trudeau
It is more than evident that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is exposed to more problems. It must be emphasized that this is not necessarily because women resign because of displeasure. Of course, it’s bad enough, but it’s even worse what they say when they walk out the door. That’s where the real problem lies.
A clear example of this is what Philpott expressed, “Unfortunately, the evidence of the efforts made by politicians and/or officials to put pressure on the former attorney general … and the evidence on the content of those efforts have generated serious concerns for me”, wrote Philpott. She adds: “It is a fundamental doctrine of the rule of law that our attorney general should not be subjected to political pressure or interference in relation to the exercise of his fiscal discretion in criminal cases. Unfortunately, I have lost confidence in how the government has dealt with this issue and how it has responded to the problems raised”.
While on the other hand, when Wilson-Raybould was dragged from the portfolio of Justice to Veterans Affairs, and at the same time the role of attorney, she launched a long public statement, expressing pride for her achievements and also emphasizing that she had always tried to defend the rule. Of law. The statement was immediately and widely commented because it was unusual for two reasons: first, such statements are rare after a cabinet change, period, and Wilson-Raybould was sending a message that Canadians, without the vital context of the alleged interference that it endured.
Source: Matt Gurney | National Post